The Recruitment Process, Step by Step: How to Hire the Right Person
By Bodhih Training · UpdatedThe short answer
A good recruitment process has eight steps: approve the hiring request, agree a success profile with the hiring manager, write a skills-based job description and an advert with a pay range, source from planned channels, screen against criteria written in advance, assess with a work sample and a structured interview, decide in a debrief that collects independent scores first, then make the offer and hand over to onboarding. Measure each step so the next hire improves.
- Decide what problem the hire solves before you reuse an old job description
- Write the success profile, screening criteria and interview anchors before you see any candidate
- Structured interviews had the highest average validity in a major 2022 re-analysis of selection research
- Collect every interviewer's scores before the debrief discussion starts
- Let AI draft and summarise; keep every decision about a person with a human
- Track time to fill, conversion, source of hire, offer acceptance and quality of hire
What are the steps in the recruitment process?
Most hiring problems are not failures of effort. They are steps skipped or done in the wrong order: advertising before agreeing what success looks like, reading CVs before deciding what to look for, discussing a candidate before everyone has scored them. A clear sequence fixes most of this.
The table below sets out eight steps, what each one produces and the mistake it prevents. It works for a single senior role and for volume hiring, although the tools at each step differ.
| Step | What it produces | Mistake it prevents |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Request | An approved hiring request with alternatives considered and a cost | Refilling a role that should have changed |
| 2. Define | A success profile: outcomes, weighted competencies, pay range, panel, timetable | Interviewers looking for different people |
| 3. Attract | A skills-based job description, an advert with the pay range, a sourcing plan | Adverts that put off the people you want |
| 4. Screen | Knockouts, anchored criteria and a threshold, applied consistently | Gut-feel screening and hidden bias |
| 5. Assess | A work sample and structured interviews with anchored scales | Unstructured chats that predict little |
| 6. Decide | Independent scores, an evidence-based debrief, references and checks | Groupthink and decisions nobody can explain |
| 7. Offer | A designed offer, a calm negotiation, a written confirmation | Losing the candidate at the last moment |
| 8. Hand over | Pre-boarding contact and a handover note to onboarding | Silence between acceptance and day one |
How do you decide whether to hire at all?
A vacancy is the cheapest moment to redesign a role, because nobody is in it yet. Before anyone touches the old job description, answer five questions on one page: what has changed, what work needs doing and how much of it, what the alternatives are (redistribute, automate, contract, move someone internally, reshape the role), what the hire costs and what leaving the work undone costs, and who approves.
The alternatives question is the one that changes outcomes. Often part of the old role can go elsewhere and the new hire becomes a sharper, more valuable job. Log the request with a unique ID so you can later see how long every role has been open and which ones are stuck.
What is a success profile, and why does it matter?
A success profile starts from the end: what will this person have achieved in twelve months if the hire goes well? From three to five outcomes, work back to the four to six skills that produce them, and then to the evidence an assessment could look for. Give each skill a weight, separate genuine day-one must-haves from things a capable person could learn in three months, and keep true knockouts, such as the legal right to work, on their own list.
This is the practical core of skills-based hiring. The idea is widely endorsed, but a February 2024 study by Harvard Business School and the Burning Glass Institute found the change from dropping degree requirements showed up in fewer than 1 in 700 hires. Removing a line from the advert is not enough; the screen and the interview must test the skill instead of the proxy.
Agree the pay range and service levels in the same meeting: how fast the hiring manager will review CVs, how fast scorecards come in, and the longest any candidate will wait without hearing from you.
How do you write a job advert that attracts the right people?
Treat the advert as a message to a busy person on a phone, not as the internal job description. Put the pay range, location and working pattern and one sentence on why the role exists in the first three lines. Then describe what the person will do as outcomes, list only genuine must-haves, say what you offer in concrete terms, and explain the stages and timetable.
Wording matters. In experiments published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 2011, Gaucher, Friesen and Kay found that adverts with more masculine-coded wording were rated less appealing by women, who also anticipated belonging less, although their view of their own skills did not change. Check for gender-coded, age-coded and jargon-heavy words, and replace proxies such as years of experience with the skill they stand for.
Pay transparency is also becoming law in more places, including the EU's Pay Transparency Directive and several US states, so check the rules wherever you hire.
How should you screen CVs fairly?
Write the criteria before you open the first application. Use a few yes or no knockouts, applied to everyone, then three to five scored criteria from the must-haves, each with a short description of what earns 0, 1 and 2. Decide the threshold for a phone screen in advance. Ask a second person to score five CVs blind; if you disagree by more than a point on most criteria, sharpen the anchors.
The reason for all this structure is that shortcuts are not harmless. In a well-known field experiment, Bertrand and Mullainathan sent fictitious CVs to employers in Boston and Chicago and found that white-sounding names received 50 percent more callbacks than otherwise similar CVs with African-American-sounding names. Hide names, photos and dates of birth for the scored pass where you can, and score career gaps on evidence rather than treating them as warnings.
- Knockouts first, consistently, then the scored pass
- Criteria and anchors written before reading
- A threshold set in advance
- A consistency check with a second screener
- A short, identical phone screen for everyone who passes
Reading helps; measuring tells you what to work on. These AI-graded assessments on AssessAll pair with this topic:
What makes a structured interview work?
Structure means four things: the same questions for every candidate, written anchors that describe what a 1, 3 and 5 answer contains, specific competencies assigned to each interviewer, and independent scoring before any discussion. Mix past-behaviour questions (what did you do) with situational questions (what would you do), which suit graduates and career changers.
The evidence for this is strong. Sackett, Zhang, Berry and Lievens re-analysed decades of selection research in the Journal of Applied Psychology in 2022 and found structured interviews had the highest mean operational validity of the methods they examined, at .42, ahead of job knowledge tests (.40), work samples (.33) and cognitive ability tests (.31). Add a short, realistic work sample scored against anchors, keep it under two hours of candidate time, and offer adjustments to everyone.
How do you run a hiring debrief without groupthink?
Collect every scorecard before the meeting, reveal the scores together, and discuss by competency rather than by candidate. The most junior interviewer speaks first and the hiring manager last. Where scores differ by two points or more, ask each person what they heard and agree a score on the evidence. Hear any strong objection first.
Finish with a short bias check: did we judge against the success profile, did anyone rely on fit, presence or polish without evidence, and would we have scored the same answer the same way from another candidate? Record the decision in two sentences of evidence. If two people meet the bar, keep the runner-up in a talent pool, with their consent.
Where should AI fit in recruitment?
AI is useful for drafting adverts and messages, summarising a CV against written criteria, suggesting interview questions and handling scheduling. It should not make decisions about people on its own. A person should review every progression and rejection and be able to explain it against the criteria.
Regulators are moving the same way. The UK Information Commissioner's Office set out key questions for organisations using AI in recruitment in November 2024, including impact assessments, bias monitoring, transparency to candidates and data minimisation. The EU AI Act classes recruitment AI as high-risk, and some US jurisdictions require bias audits or notices. The CIPD's 2026 resourcing report also found that 27% of recruiting organisations said candidates were making excessive use of generative AI in applications, which is one more reason to judge evidence in work samples and interviews rather than polish on paper.
| AI can help with | A human must decide or check |
|---|---|
| Drafting adverts and outreach | Every message before it is sent |
| Summarising a CV against written criteria | The summary's accuracy, by reading the CV |
| Suggesting interview questions | The final questions and anchors |
| Scheduling and reminders | Adjustments requested by candidates |
| Spotting patterns in your hiring data | Every progression and rejection |
Which recruitment metrics should you track?
Pick a small set, define them once and keep the definitions stable. Time to fill (requisition opened to offer accepted) shows how long roles stay open. Time to hire (application to acceptance) shows how fast you move a candidate. Stage conversion shows where people drop out. Source of hire shows which channels produce hires, not just applicants. Offer acceptance shows whether your offers and process compete. Cost per hire should include internal time as well as external spend.
Quality of hire closes the loop. Ask the hiring manager for a rating at 90 days, take a performance rating at six to twelve months and note who stays for a year. After a dozen hires, compare those results with interview scores and sources. That is how a recruitment process learns.
The Recruitment End-to-End Kit from Bodhih Training includes a workbook that calculates these measures from the sheets you already fill in, alongside the forms, question bank and message library for every step.
Run your next hire with every step ready
The Recruitment End-to-End Kit from Bodhih Training gives you an e-book, a recruitment command centre workbook, fillable forms, a question bank with anchored scales, a candidate message library and a 6-week calendar, so each step in this guide has a file ready to open.
Sources
- SIOP: Is cognitive ability the best predictor of job performance? (on Sackett et al., 2022)
- CIPD: Resourcing and talent planning surveys
- Burning Glass Institute and Harvard Business School: Skills-Based Hiring, The Long Road from Pronouncements to Practice (2024)
- Harvard Kennedy School Gender Action Portal: Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality
- NBER: Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? (Bertrand and Mullainathan)
- ICO: Thinking of using AI to assist recruitment? Our key data protection considerations
More from the Bodhih family
Questions people ask next
How long should a recruitment process take?
It depends on the role and market, so set your own target and measure against it. For many professional roles a six-week cycle from approved request to accepted offer is a workable plan, with notice periods added on top. Track time in each stage so you can see where delays come from.
How many interview stages are enough?
Usually two assessment stages after the phone screen: a work sample or first structured interview, and a final stage. More stages add time and lose candidates without adding much evidence. Make sure every competency is assessed once by someone trained to assess it.
Should we publish the salary range in job adverts?
In a growing number of places the law requires it, and even where it does not, a range saves time and reduces mismatched applications. Agree the range in the intake meeting, before the advert is written.
What is an anchored rating scale?
A scale where each score has a written description of what an answer at that level contains. For example, a 1 describes general reassurance with no specific action, and a 5 describes a diagnosed root cause, the right people involved and a measurable result. Anchors let two interviewers give the same answer the same score.
How can interviewers check their own judgement?
Calibrate before interviews by scoring the same sample answers and discussing differences. AssessAll's Interviewer Judgment & Hiring Bias assessment is one way to see how you read interview evidence; repeat it after a few hires to see what has changed.
Are reference checks still worth doing?
Yes, when they test specific evidence. Get the candidate's consent, ask every referee the same questions about two or three competencies with examples, and accept that many employers will only confirm dates and title as policy.
How do we help hiring managers get better at interviewing?
Train them on structured interviewing, give them a question bank with anchors, and review their scorecards against debrief outcomes. Turn one or two skills into a personal development goal; Jobulary explains how a development plan built around specific skills works.